How Goalkeepers and Investors are very similar?

Russia 2018 was hailed as a huge success. Moody’s, the ratings agency, said the World Cup’s boost to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) would be between $26 billion and $30.

Russia 2018 was hailed as a huge success. Moody’s, the ratings agency, said the World Cup’s boost to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) would be between $26 billion and $30.8 billion over the 10 years from 2013 through to 2023.


One of the more notable statistics from Russia 2018 was the fact that there were 22 penalties scored, considerably more than in any previous World Cup. As I watched some of the action, I was reminded that investors are also prone to making short-term decisions. So, is there a link between how investors and goalkeepers behave when making decisions under pressure?


Many goalkeepers, not unlike investors, have an ‘action bias’. The urge to catch the latest investment trend, such as bitcoin or blockchain, runs deep. According to a 2007 study of 286 penalty kicks, almost 29pc are shot down the middle – a similar number to the amount placed to the left or right. The study found that the goalkeeper has a 33pc chance of saving the penalty if choosing to remain in the centre. However, 96pc of goalkeepers chose to dive to the left or right, eschewing the option to stay in the middle.


Investors, just like goalkeepers, see action as a positive thing. In today’s world of 24-hour information and soundbites, it seems that being ‘active’ is part of who we are.


In the investment world, Ned Davis, a US-based investment research company, has shown that investors are now holding equities for much shorter periods of time. Over the last 90 years, the average holding period of individual equities has declined from eight years to approximately eight months as of the end of 2016. The need for action also extends to investment fund managers.


A recent study* by the University of Ontario, suggests that past fund performance is negatively impacted by the number of times a fund manager changes the investments within his portfolio. The study suggests that the frequent churning of a portfolio is value destroying for investors and results in poorer performance than those fund managers who stick with their investments.


The global stock market (MSCI World) has increased by 1,860% since 1970. If you tried to identify the market troughs during this period, and as a result missed the top 10 performing months due to poor ‘market timing’, your investment return would have reduced by 66%.


Sometimes it pays to be inactive, and to “stay the course” with your investments. The key is to be invested.


*Portfolio Turnover Activity and Mutual Fund Performance

Ready to get started?


See what our financial planning experts can do for you.

Written by Pat Leahy, Certified Financial Planner

Published 2019-10-23

Get in touch or learn more about us